should express a little 'better than my thinking about certain issues on which I was often misunderstood these days.
To begin with I Nor I do not like sympathy for the Muslims, especially the Islamic fundamentalists.
In particular, the fundamentalists make me vomit, any confession of a mass they are part.
The Koran keep it together with the Gospels and the Bible in the same shelf where I keep Harry Potter, Tolkien, and the whole Fantasy in general.
I find it stupid political structure based on mythology (among other things, mythology to mythology, I prefer the Greek myths to the Gospels or the Koran), but even if I'm stupid, nowadays there are so many wars in which they act as the official reasons the interpretation of certain passages in the so-called sacred texts.
What bothers me though is the mystification of reality and attempts to shape it to support positions rhetorical summarized well in the application manifest "because those can say what they want and instead we have to respect them?"
First, because we fortunately we lay and democratic (and secular democracy in which there would be time for discussion) and this fund would be the only "good" that we can export (and is not a thing to do to the sound of bombs). Then
because if they are in a war zone and geopolitical hot for generations is not our fault that we broke the balls in every possible way, and you can not forget from day to day that passes a virtual wall that divided the world into two parts, and there it is played and you play the whole issue of energy.
Only in Italy the Cold War gave a death toll comparable to that of a war in every way (in thousands of deaths and injuries), and that's because you were in the sandwich between the various blocks of us and gave vent the balance of Yalta and the question Palestinian, let alone what has brought him!
We made them angry, and now we indignamo and interpret any wonder that our insult as a "matter of pride." Who does not see this is blind. However
my rationality compels me a responsibility that is to say that Islamic fundamentalism is the most idiotic expression of incivility can, and another is not that exactly what America and Israel need to perpetuate the regime permanent war in which they have thrown the Middle East. The fundamentalist Muslims of today are nothing more than fish to bite American, and often financed and supported by those who hold the cane Fisheries (who does not think of anything other than a mixed grill!).
So here is that the intervention is to see that idiot Ratzinger's fundamentalist view, act to tighten the aggravation, but then nothing could be expected: as they have rightly said the leaders of the Tehran exchange of his pontificate was revealed for what it is, that is a dangerous change Catholic culture.
Wasting no time to exploit massacres implemented by Al-Qaeda and financed by the CIA (and there will always be there if not Oriana Fallaci someone who will do it for you), putting a bit 'by the rhetoric, we must avoid amenities such as the ideological opposition Muhammad-Christ.
These people can not respond with "Christ."
also because, as Luttazzi, if the answer is "Christ" is the wrong question!
The only reasonable answer, if you really want to solve problems, and secularism.
not be opposed to two religious ideas and then bring the opposition on the political level: everyone has the right to live their spirituality, but you can do so with proper secularization, that every religious thought does not affect others.
"Viva havens of virgin fuck;
I would explode ... but ... big hoes!"
Epocalisse - Caparezza
0 comments:
Post a Comment